The near-full moon, photographed July 29th 2015, just before the blue moon. |
'Once in a while, in a big blue moon,
there comes a night
like this.'
Joni Mitchell
So sang Joni Mitchell in the opening lines of Night Ride
Home. And so tonight on 31st July we have our own blue moon - a real one! But if
you’re expecting to wait up and watch the moon turn blue, you might be left
standing alone, without a dream in your heart – because the moon doesn't turn blue on this sort of blue moon. And if that
saddens you, then you have two 16th century Greenwich friars to
blame, who first coined the term (more on that in a moment).
The fact is, you’re not going to notice very much, other
than a fabulous full moon in the sky (the Brits among us will have to take that
with a pinch of salted cheese), but the point is that we’ve already had a full
moon this July, and now we have a second one (two in one month!), which is blue-min rare.
Think about the word ‘month’ – which comes from the word ‘moon’
in English, as it does in nearly all languages, as it does in the Bible and the Koran. The Jewish, Islamic, Hindu and Chinese calendars
(among others) still use the lunar-months of just over 29-and-a-half days, in combination
with the transit of the sun, to calculate the month. A new moon equals a new month. So, if you think about it, having two
full-moons within a single month is quite a betrayal.
A Betrayal
And that’s precisely why it’s a blue moon – the old English
word for betrayal was ‘belewe’, making the ‘betrayal moon’ the ‘belewe moon’. This should not be confused with the word ‘blewe’,
which is the word Chaucer used to talk about blue things, such as violets:
Fro day to nyght From
day to night
She dooth hire bisynesse and al hire myght, She gave her care and a
And by hire beddes heed she made a mewe And by her bed’s head she
made a mew
And covered it with veluettes blewe, And covered
it with violets blue,
In signe of trouthe that is in wommen sene. As a sign of truth that
is seen in women.
from Geoffrey Chaucer (c. 1343-1400), The Squire’s Tale.
Except that the two words were confused, and so the ‘betrayal
[belewe] moon’ became the ‘blue' [blewe] moon.
The two words may not have been confused, had it not been
for the fact that the church used the cycles of the moon to calculate
the precise date of Easter. So here
comes the history lesson:
The History Lesson!!
Unlike many
other festivals in the calendar, Easter is a movable feast - i.e. it's not fixed by date. This was decided in 325AD when the council of
Nicaea decided that Easter Sunday would take place on the first Sunday after
the first full moon occurring on or after the vernal equinox (March 21st). BUT – and it’s a big BUT – the Greek and
Roman churches still could not agree upon a standard version by which this calculation
could be made, and that rogue, betraying, belewe
moon wasn’t making life any easier.
The
scandal was still being dramatised in England in 1528, when two Greenwich
friars, Willam Roy and Jerome Barlowe, published a poetic pamphlet protesting against
the church’s prescriptions of what was true and what was false; and these included
small matter of the church claiming to decide the one-and-only correct, which
was in fact based only on interpretation.
And so they wrote of those churchmen who are ‘wily foxes’:
If they say the moon is blue Yf they say the mone is blewe
We must believe that it is true We must beleve that it is true
Conceding to their interpretation. Admittynge their interpretacion
I said it was poetic, and not only does it rhyme, but it
works on a clever pun: the ‘belewe’, or betraying moon, only happens
once in a while (which we know from Joni Mitchell), whilst the appearance of a ‘blue moon’ would be ridiculous, and therefore, really rare. In effect, Roy and Barlowe were saying, 'if the churchmen say
the moon is blue, or if they say it is made of cheese, or that there’s actually
a man in it, we must believe [beleve]
them'.
And so the phrase landed in English.
What does it matter?
So you’re not going to see anything different tonight than
on any other full moon (sorry). But
understanding the blue moon does help us to reconnect with a time when mankind
was more in touch with nature and followed its cycles. The lunar months marked the changes of the
season: each of the four seasons was three-cycles of the moon long, and when the fourth cycle started, people knew a new season had started and would know whether they should start ploughing and planting, or watering and growing, or reaping the harvest, or just enjoying a nice long drink (whilst keeping an eye on the moon). But sometimes, just once in
a...um...while, the moon might play a trick and start a fourth cycle before the
end of the season, so it’s important to be aware of the betrayal so you knew what to do with your crops.
A truly blue blue-moon?
The moon photographed from Norfolk in April 2010, following the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull. Is it blue? |
So, I’ve disappointed you – the moon isn’t actually going to
be blue, or made of cheese, or have a man in it. But once in a while, it can
appear just a little bit blue – but that’s even rarer.
For that you need a volcano spurting a cloud of ash into the
sky. For example, it was said that after the eruption
of Krakatoa in 1883, the moon appeared blue for almost two years. Such an eruption hasn’t tainted our view of
the moon to that extent for a while, although I do recall those great colourful skies
that we had the week after the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in 2010 – I was
photographing in Norfolk at the time, where a particularly dense cloud of ash
was visible in the sky. This was especially noticeable in the evenings, as it brought out the exquisite twilight
colours like I’d never seen before. Was
the moon bluer at this time? I’m not sure, but I'll never forget those colours that were to paraphrase Joni Mitchell
once again) ‘like some surrealist invented this night’.
Avocet in twilight reflections, Norfolk, April 2010. The colours were provided by the ash cloud from Eyjafjallajökull and have not been altered in processing. |
No comments:
Post a Comment